ledeagenda.com

-Beware The Government/Media Complex-

Friday, November 30, 2007

College Football Games Of Note For The Weekend of November 30th, 2007

Ok, here we go, the last regular week of the 2007 College Football Season. My, oh my, time flies.

The Big-12 Championship Game-

(9) Oklahoma v (1) Missouri- Sorry Tigers fans, but you are going to get crushed. Enjoy that (1) ranking for the few short hours left that you will have it. On ABC.

The ACC Championship Game-

(6) Virginia Tech v (11) Boston College- This game is just juicy. And we all pretty much knew it would come to this at the end of the year. Matt Ryan’s biggest downfall this year has been his interceptions, that will feed right into Virginia Tech’s hands, who boasts one of the nations stingiest defenses. Call me crazy, but I am still taking the upset. Look for the Senior leadership of Matt Ryan to shake off an ugly start to lead Boston College over the top. Only a few bad intercpetions could ruin an otherwise perfect year for BC. On ABC.

The SEC Chamionship Game-

(14) Tennessee v (7) LSU- Let me start of by saying I have been a STRONG supporter of Eric Ainge all year. I think NFL scouts need to take a serious look at this kid, a kid who played with a broken hand all year and still managed to steer his team to the SEC title game. But, that being said, they are facing LSU. And one thing we know for sure about LSU- they don’t give up points in regulation. Unless the Volunteers can hang on till the end of the fourth quater there will be little left to be said. On CBS.

The PAC-10 Clinch Games-

UCLA v (8) USC and Arizona v (13) Arizona State- I beleive USC is coming into the best of its play all season. It’s one of the safest bets in College Football, Pete Carroll does not lose in November. They will more than likely share the PAC-10 title, but I wouldn’t be surprized by an outright USC win. I still just do not by ASU. On ABC.

The Big East Clinch Game-

Pittsburgh v (2) West Virginia- West Virginia will win, but the bigger question: will it be convincing enough to hold on to the BCS Title game spot? I have my doubts.

The WAC Game-

Washington v (12) Hawaii- Everyone loves ending their season on the beaches of Hawaii. Too bad they have to play Hawaii when they get there.

The MWC Game-

(19) BYU v San Diego St.- Yuck, what a way to end the season. MWC Champs BYU roll on.

 One Other Game of note-

Oregon St v (17) Oregon- the 111th meeting of the Civil War. Take the Ducks, but know this- this game is almost always close, and one thing we know for sure, the Beavers always manage a surprise win or two in the season. Last year they stumped USC, will the trip up the Ducks this year? I would highly doubt it, Beavers fans will look to the baseball season to regain pride in the PAC-10.

posted by Luke at 16:37:55  

Friday, November 30, 2007

Republicans Have Better Mental Health

Don’t let Micheal Savage see this poll result: it turns out that liberalism may well be an actual mental disorder.

Of course, we all knew that. But as Mark Twain once said, “common sense really isnt so common”. Errr, at least if your a Liberal anyway.

But here is the sad part: there still is enormous pressure on the Republican party to adopt ‘moderate’ posistions on key Democratic proposals. Proposals from the very same people, in this poll, that are least likely to have sound mind and body. Proposals that fly in the face of common sense, protecting our boarders and keeping a check on unmitigated government growth.

But therein lies the rub: a liberal doesn’t know how to be a liberal unless the Goverment grows. After all, life can only be made better when a central and absolute authority mandates it, right? Perhaps their obsession with politcally correct living, with using the might of government as the solution, has finally caught up to them?

Another interesting poll here.

Taken literally it follows that one could argue that the concepts of lower taxes, smaller government and family values not only promote constitutional living, but also increases your preceveived sense of mental health. It begs the question: how it North Korea doing these days?

A slight digression:

Politico.com noted that in Wed. GOP debate:

If you were a Martian and had watched the first 30 minutes of the debate, you would have thought that illegal immigration was the chief problem facing America, and that by sealing its borders America could end its woes.

One of those woes, by the way, is not a lack of affordable, dependable, effective health insurance that you can retain for life.

Americans must already have that. Because not a single question was asked about it in the entire two hour-plus debate.

Actually Roger, that is the exact point. Republican voters are not looking to, or wanting the government, involved in anyway with health care. The YouTube Debate was user generated questions: questions from the GOP voters to the GOP candidates. I am sure, had there been repeat queries on the subject, CNN would have loved to pounce all over the Republicans on that.

But they couldn’t, because there were none. The GOP candidates would be wise to listen up: the liberty and smaller government faction of the party is sending a lound and ominous warning, “Ebrace new governmental programs under the guise of moderatism at your own risk.”

And yes, Roger, illeagal immigration is that important that it would have taken up that much time in our national debates.

So how does this all tie together? We need to realize that our own self-worth and respect is far more valuable when not turned over to some central governmental authority. The free market, empowered individuals, and human inititive is a much better problem solver than any sort of government study, regulation, program or ‘benefit’ [read: welfare].

Taken all together I would suggest this: Republicans are happier because the concepts of limited government, less taxation and family values allows people to live their lives to their fullest potential. Democrats, on the other hand, are falling victim to their own programs, reporting lower levels of mental health. But then again, I think anyone would be driven insane if they had to wait on the government for a solution.

posted by Luke at 15:40:17  

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Time is short

Ron Paul sent out an email reminding his supporters:

We have approximately 900 hours until the Iowa caucuses and about 1,000 hours until voters in New Hampshire go to the polls.

That is a scary thought.  A little over a month to go before we start whittling down the candidates for the Presidential Nominations. A little over a month for blogs and alternative media to get the message out.

Given Rudy’s sudden resurgence in the polls, Real Clear Politics has him at a 13% lead nationally, it looks like the worst possible choice for the Republican nomination may well be shoved down our throats. Which begs the question: when is it time to say enough? When is it time to take a stand for principle?

It seems almost an impossible task to re-energize the base of the Republican party in time to create a meaningful grass-roots effort that is motivated to get-out-the-vote. We have lost our way and the voters know it. Waxing poetic we are still clinging to the hopeful ideal of less government, less taxation and family values. This despite knowing full well that ultimately the choice will be between ideology or keeping Hillary out of office.

And that is the worst part about this: we are more focused on this hellcat than our own core beliefs. Why is it that we have to abandon our cause to stop hers? Don’t we become the very thing we are working against if we do not hold true to our own cause? What benefit is it to us if in attempting to stop Hillarycare we end up passing Republican-Alternative-Healthcare? There is none, the end result is the same: expansion of government services, increased tax burdens and distribution of taxpayer monies.

900 hours until we find out if the Republican party will remain committed to the ideals that have made it the, ’silent majority’ party for the better portion of the last decade.

900 hours until the voting starts and there still has not been a debate on public television. Based on the statistics their is still 46% of American households that do not have cable and thusly have not been able to watch the candidates debate. Will the parties reach out to these voters, many of them key constituencies in each of the parties respectful camps?

900 hours until the voting stats the Demon-rats are still raking in the cash at nearly a 4:1 ratio when compared the the GOP. A reflection of the party’s current drift away from its core principles.

900 hours and still the only issue the media wishes this election to be about is Iraq. Never mind taxes, liberty or freedom. Never mind the unconstitutional spending. Never mind stopping government handouts of taxpayer money. Never mind the abuses of government and lack of accountability. No, we are just to vote, like sheep, for someone who will ‘fix’ an unfixable situation. Wars are messy, our political debates don’t have to be.

900 hours left: are we headed for a train-wreck or takeoff? Let us hope Liberty can spread her wings.


What do you think of the new site design? Easier to read? Post a comment and let me know! Personally- the black background of the old design was straining my eyes, and thus the change.

posted by Luke at 14:02:50  

Sunday, November 25, 2007

The Collapse Of Currency

CNN reports, “Jittery Consumers Likely To Trigger Recession”.

Actually, the consumer has very little to do with it. Sorry Ted Turner.

A recession of devastating consequences is about to hit us, and so far all the media is just blaming the consumers for not spending. Hard to spend money you don’t have.

Our houses are worth less and harder to sell.

Peak Oil, which may have been reached in 2005, is expected to push oil up into the $150 a barrel range.

The American dollar is increasingly losing value in a global economy.

Even credit, which was largely responsible for the ‘recovery’ after the economic collapse following 9-11, is now drying up as banks realize risky loans and extended credit options have hit their limit. And we all know that at some point credit must be re-paid.

How exactly is the ‘consumer’ responsible for any of that? And furthermore, why exactly should we be expected to spend our way out of it? It’s asinine to assume that the market is tapped because of falling credit and property values and that the solution is to encourage people to spend more.

An increasing number of analysis are saying a recession might actually be what is needed. That it might actually better people’s economic conditions is never discussed. The government/media complex chooses to focus only on how it will affect Wall St, a short-sighted and and increasingly narrow point of view in a global economy.

So where do we go from here?

History shows countless examples of people who have built capital in a ‘down market’. But it does require us to slow our spending, invest our money and built real wealth not based on credit. It’s not easy to do. But think about it, if your budget is short, do you really need a $400 a month SUV payment when an older model will do just as fine?  Is that ‘interest only’ or ARM mortgage really worth the economic backload at the end? These are consumer driven models in response to the recession. And that is exactly what the MSM does not want to happen.

But what choice does the consumer have? Even economists are saying a ‘average’ holiday season is in store.

But here is something else to consider: job cuts are are to follow if, as predicted, the economy continues its downward slide this holiday season. Are you  ready to be the first to act?

Get your car paid off now.

Cuts the frills, cable, subscriptions, etc.

Make sure your investments are liquid, consider pulling them out now to consolidate and eliminate debt.

Consider starting that venture project now, have something one the side to balance your families economic load.

But most importantly realize this: the biggest opportunity will usually coming at the worst possible time. Positioning yourself now will pay off in the end. Looking to the government to to solve this mess will only result in actions that are too little and too late.

“This too shall pass”

And those who are smart now could come out better in the end.

posted by Luke at 13:59:02  

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Can’t get amnesty passed? Just make your own laws!

Did you catch this story?

Elaine Chow, puppet of the New World Order, is now preparing to throw out laws designed to encourage U.S. companies to hire U.S. workers first.

Do not be fooled, the New World Order is relentless, vicious and smart. Conservative blogs managed to shut down the Dubai ports deal and the amnesty package. But that doesn’t mean we won. If anything, like poking a stick into a hornets nest, we may have made the situation much, much worse.

Let me explain. The amnesty bill essentially had 8-9 parts, all of the them, minus constructing a fence at our border, were highly offensive. Conservatives rightly organized and got the public involved to shut the bill down. But now, as demonstrated above, the entire amnesty bill plus some is being implemented, one ‘regulatory ruling’, one ‘administrative rule’ at a time. The only solution we have to bad government in a democracy is to get involved. And it appears the solution is worse than the problem, organizing a successful opposition to 10-20 new ‘regulations’ would be nearly impossible. And that, my friends, is exactly what they are betting on.

Quite simply, incrementalist social policy is the single greatest threat to freedom and liberty that exists today. The people do not have control over anonymous agency heads whom only have to hold faux public hearings in order to implement their agenda. The only solution may well be a radicalization of democracy. The solution may well be to realize what the Founders always intended, that the powers of the Executive branch are to be limited.

I am calling for every Executive Department head and Supreme Court justice to be elected. It is the ONLY way that the public voice could carry the level of legitimacy needed to demand real chance. Think it wouldn’t work? That is how most States’ Executive branches are set up. You may already be living in such a situation.

Here is a chart that lists all Departments of the Executive branch.

Do you realize how much social policy is ram-roded through these branches of government? And do you realize that in all of this morass of regulatory power the only person whom has to answer to you at election time is the President? Quite simply, the scope of power that is in the people’s control is way too far removed from that which the Founders intended. By putting Department heads up for election, we can ensure that the proper amount of scrutiny and public weight is put on all matters of social policy and regulation.

By the time President Bush leaves office, nearly every single element of the Amnesty bill will be de-facto federal law. Introduced not by legislation into the House or Senate and signed into law by the President, these laws are merely put into existence at the whim of the Agency head whom claims the most authority.

As this article notes, what Elaine Chow is proposing to do goes directly against the laws that her agency is supposed to enforce. Her ‘regulation’ is completely unconstitutional and Congress, which has adjudicated their power to these branches, will just sit on their ass and do absolutely nothing about it. And that is because they completely support it, they just don’t want to have to answer to their constituency by having had an actual public vote on the issue of amnesty.

Stripping the President of the ability to nominate his or her own cronies for Department heads is the only way to restore Constitutional public representation of federal laws. And unless we drastically reconsider how our leaders answer to the public in this democracy, we may well be powerless to stop any legislation that we are opposed to. Even some of the most important issues like that of blanket amnesty for illegals.

posted by Luke at 19:18:48  

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Happy Thanksgiving!

.

posted by Luke at 15:52:21  

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

College Football Games Of Note For The Weekend of November 24th, 2007

The Heisman Bet-

ESPN Heisman Watch, here.

Missouri’s Chase Daniels and Florida’s Tim Tebow are emerging as front-runners. Daniels could solidify his run with a win over undefeated Kansas this weekend.

The SEC Games-

Arkansas v (1) LSU- Arkansas will feed the ball to McFadden in a vain attempt to control the game. LSU’s defense will adjust quickly forcing Dick to throw more, resulting in bad things. No matter how the game is played, LSU will own it and command the the play. LSU heads to 11-1 going into the SEC title game. On CBS.

(7) Georgia v Georgia Tech- Georgia should win, but gives more points than GT. Can the home field advantage and the high-octane offense pull off the upset? No, you know better than that. SEC teams always win out of conference. On ABC.

(18) Tennessee v Kentucky- If played a month ago, this may have been this week’s most talked about game. As it is, Kentucky is just trying to regain its momentum as it looks to next year. Upset special- Tennessee is 1-3 on the road this year and Ainge is playing banged up. Any hopes of clinching the SEC East for the Volunteers lie in controlling the Wildcats’ Woodson whom has only given up 8 interceptions. Kentucky’s run game is not that impressive but after they build a reasonable lead, look for them to go into a time-kill run game. Tennessee’s emotions may be a bit too high to recoup an abysmal road game record this year. On CBS.

(22) Clemson v South Carolina- Steve Spurrier did not return to the college game to go 6-6. Also feeding into the Cocks’ game is Auburn’s deflation after LSU clinched the East. Gamecocks win. Shots of Spurrier blowing a head gasket on the sideline will be mandatory.

The PAC-10 Games-

(11) USC v (6) Arizona State- They lost to Oregon, they will also lose to USC. Arizona State is overrated.

(9) Oregon v UCLA- I personally hope Dixon gets to play again. But that is probably wishful thinking. Look for Oregon to rely on its run game to set the tempo, if that doesn’t work another disappointment will be in store for the Ducks.

The Big-12 Games-

*** must watch game of the week ***

(4) Missouri v (2) Kansas- To be honest I don’t know who will win this game. There is not enough history of either team being relevant to judge the situation. But I do know this: Kansas at home, giving up 10 less points a game than Missouri, scoring more points, and having all offensive positions filled with production while Missouri lacks a strong run game. What worries me is Kansas folding under pressure, having never been ranked #2 in the nation before. Even if Kansas wins this game, the pressure will only grow having to still yet play in the Big-12 title game. I will take Missouri, but would not be at all surprised to see the Jayhawks run the table. On ABC.

***

Oklahoma State v (10) Oklahoma- Sooners. Take the Sooners.

(13) Texas v Texas A&M- Take the horns.

An upset would give the ranked survivor the Big-12 South.

The Big-10 Games-

(5) Ohio State won the Big-10. Ummm, didn’t we know that would happen?

The ACC Games-

Most of the games were covered in the SEC matchups, the remainders:

Miami (FL) v (14) Boston College- Told you Ryan would lead them to a win last week. He will lead them to a win this week too.

(8) Virginia Tech v (16) Virginia- another in-state rival game, only this one matters. For my money I will take VT, but in all honesty, Virginia has impressed more this year. Upset? Maybe…

The Big East Games-

(20) UConn v (3) West Virginia- A UConn loss here would cap an over hyped season and WV will roll on and face Pitt next. I do not buy UConn. And besides Slaton and White have combined for +/- 2000 yards, 17 touchdowns on 338 carries. How can you bet against that??

(23) South Florida v Pitt- take the Bulls. Disappointing losses this season, but still have a lot to play for- a bigger money bowl is still a possibility.

(24) Cincinnati v Syracuse- Take Cin. Orangemen are football girly men this year.

The WAC Games-

Gee, what do you know, the WAC has its only two relevant teams playing each other to cap the year off. Big surprise.

(19) Boise State v (15) Hawaii- Ok, I know Hawaii is good, ok great. But honestly, I truly believe the Broncos elevate their game when its needed most, while Hawaii stays the same great game every week. The ability to adjust and play above their game will suit BSU who comes into this game fully healthy and a loaded depth chart. We still don’t know if Colt Brennen will play for sure, signs point to yes though. The first half will be close and distressing, but look for the Broncos to take over during the 2nd half. June Jones will have his typical ‘deer in headlights’ look that he has every time he plays Boise State.

And finally just to pile on…..

Utah State (1-10) and University of Idaho (1-10)- Ok, so the best of WAC plays each other, so why not the worst? It’s incredibly painful to comment on this game, but here we go. Idaho gives up too many interceptions (15) and points per game (38) to even be able to stay in a game with Utah State. Watch Jackson’s timing with Myers, they connected for two TD’s last week. This week is another chance to get some reps for next year. Hey Vandal fans- look at Boise State’s and the Vandals’ record~ who is really the ‘jackass’ this year? Tell your new coach to shut his fat yap and focus on winning some damn games. Unless you like playing at a Division II level…

Notre Dame at Stanford- Take the upset and Notre Dame will finish the season 2-10. No amount of money can be thrown at the BCS Committees to buy yourself into a bowl game with that record. Which begs the question: will Notre Dame give Weis one more season to find out if it is really just a ‘recruiting problem?’. I would be surprised if they paid him what would be needed just to go away. Weis had better land one hell of a recruiting class this off-season.


Did I miss the call? Register as a user and let me know! Register here.

posted by Luke at 21:32:12  

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

They didn’t ask me, did they ask you?

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://skreened.com/avatar/product/y/v/w/yvwjzxfibbgizooumelg.jpg&imgrefurl=http://skreened.com/action/search%3Ftag%3Dagainst&h=75&w=75&sz=6&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=71YggLjp7dWb6M:&tbnh=71&tbnw=71&prev=/images%3Fq%3Danti-rudy%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN 

Politico.com, although one of my favorite sites, often fails to get reporting right.

Such is the case with this story.

To start, let me provide evidence that DIRECTLY contradicts what political hack Ben Adler writes. For those to lazy to click the link above, Adler argues that younger voters favor Guilliani and he has one University sponsored poll to prove it.

Apparently he missed the numerous stores as of late detailing younger voters candidate of choice- Ron Paul. A simple Google search, as provided here, would have given him HONEST data to work with. But Apparently being a mouthpiece for the Rudy campaign was more important for this NY educated RINO.

He also DIRECTLY contradicts himself, here.

But those are just side notes. Here are my main beefs with the article:

1) He calls Rudy a ‘moderate’. Excuse me? How is supporting abortion, supporting gay marriage, supporting amnesty a ‘moderate’ position? Seems right out of the Progressive playbook to me.

2) He uses only one poll, a University of New Hampshire/MTV ‘Rock the Vote Poll’, as evidence. The ‘Rock The Vote’ poll is terribly biased- wow big surprise a liberal college teaming up with a liberal television network to produce a poll with liberal results. Sorry MTV, polling NY, Mass and New Hampshire is NOT the pulse of America’s youth. Next time, try spreading out your data over all geographic areas.

 3) He completely misses the point:

Younger voters are more likely to get their political information from television and less from newspapers than older voters, Smith added. Romney’s intense campaigning in New Hampshire has not had the same effect on them that it has had on older voters.

Younger voters don’t get there information from TV or newspapers because we were raised with the internet.

But that is not the point. The point here is that Adler is serving as another MSM trying socially engineer your vote DESPITE the facts! People like him don’t care that more young people have donated time AND money to the Ron Paul campaign than to the Rudy campaign. People like him only care about University/.Edu polling which no longer has dominance it once had in the youth market thanks to the availability of information on the internet.  Great a New Hampshire college campus is pro-Rudy, but that doesn’t represent America Ben. Look at the data.

It drives me stark-raving mad that that the media is playing up younger voters as uneducated, ignorant and socially liberal. It directly contradicts what many have noted as the ‘family time’ generation. The role of the internet in reaching out to younger voters cannot be overlooked.

Ron Paul hasn’t. That is were most of his support comes from.

But what is even more disturbing here is how the media, through the communist tactic of incrementalism is now referring to ‘gay-marriage’, amnesty, and pro-abortion as ‘moderate’ positions. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is an assault of accept political norms and it is a battle that conservatives cannot back down on. Simply accepting the liberal creep into the Republican midst is why so many people have turned against the Republican party.

We have to return to our values. Less taxes, less government, family values.

That means no socialized medicine, no gay-marriage, no amnesty and certainly no acceptance of abortion.

That also means no Rudy.

And for the record, I am a young voter. And no, I don’t lean moderate or for Rudy. But who asked me anyway??

posted by Luke at 19:19:46  

Sunday, November 18, 2007

The School System as Judge

 

I write about this subject with great hesitation because I know that harassment by government officials is routine for those objecting to what is deemed, ‘necessary’ or ‘required’. However I feel the time to be quiet, for all areas in life, is over. Conservatives, Liberals, everyone with a concern must speak up now. Our nation is a crossroads, will we be complacent is letting those with power socially engineer a system with flaws? Or will we wake and and realize liberty, the securing of which is the ONLY legitimate reason for government to exist according to the Founders, needs to rule the day?

I am talking about the subject of forced childhood vaccinations.

Quite simply, although there does not appear to be a direct link between early childhood vaccinations and the increasing rates of autism in this country, numerous studies need to indicate that there may be procedural or mechanical flaws that is contributing to the alarming rise of autism in the United States.

I do not intend to for this post to be a scientific article, but the research does exist that either an element that currently exists in the MMR and Hep B vaccine is contributing  to the rise in autism [more than likely the mercury compounds that exist therein] or that the vaccines, when administered prior to age 2, may trigger developmental abnormalities that may not otherwise exist.

One source on the possible link, here.

One source on autism awareness and causes, here.

Yet another source that argues Thimerosal [i.e. the mercury additive] causes autism, here.

But I am *NOT* writing this post to sway you one way or another on childhood vaccinations. Know this- my child is fully vaccinated according to the state immunization schedule. However, that does not mean I feel guilt everyday for not have researched this issue heavier before we chose to accept the state’s persuasion.

I am writing this post to advocate for parents rights.

It seems immensely dangerous to grant government the power to forcibly medicate your child when the possibility may exist that the vaccine itself, as currently rendered, could trigger developmental disorders.

A slight diversion, but the media being the media will never otherwise connect the two. But we know better.

Boston PD want authority to search children’s rooms, without a warrant. That story, here.

Do you see where this is going? Under the guise, ‘to protect the children’ that government wants to suspend your civil rights and introduce forced medication~ to hell with the consequences! Quite simply it is unacceptable. The government deems your child as it’s own property. You mearly comply with the requests that government makes with your little, ‘wards of the state’.

As I mentioned before, I post on this issue with great reluctance. The ‘noble’ medical profession boarders on that of a fascist empire, where as long a ’sound health’ is implied anything goes. Many otherwise quality parents have been harassed by civil authorities for questioning mandatory vaccination scheduling.

Please know this: in it enormously, if not impossible, to have a discussion about this with your child’s Pediatrician. The legal environment is such that absolute compliance for CDC reports is one of the best ways to fight off malpractice lawsuits. Should you choose to accept this as an issue, be prepared: Your child’s doctor WILL lie to you in order to cover their ass. Until further research is done as to why autism is spiking after vaccinations, they have but little choice but to operate in such a manner.

But that doesn’t mean your are the one whom has to be ultimately responsible for your child’s well-being. Research the links. Ask your pediatrician if they use Thimerosol free vaccinations. Ask them if they screen for genetic abnormalities that could trigger autism when combined with an earlier vaccination schedule.

Let me put it this way- if they knew mercury was in the shots, and continued to give them, what assurances to we really have that OTHER dangerous additives are not still present in the vaccine? We have none.

This legislation is outright abuse of governmental power. Due process, probable cause, and a fair trail all are thrown out by imposing a school-house court system for parents whom choose to research their child’s health. Again, every action has an equal an opposite reaction- its a fundamental law of nature. This is not an issue you can just read a blog post about and become an ‘expert’ on. It will require time, effort and possibly awkward and tension filled moments with your doctor. But if you don’t ask if mercury is being pumped into your child, who will?

Efforts to hide the truth usually take effort that would not otherwise need to be taken. We can only surmise by the actions taken by the Maryland School District that an open debate about this issue will not be tolerated. Given the data above, we can only wonder where the truth lies on this issue.


A warning: I am not medically trained. Any material presented herein should be discussed with a trusted medical advisor. Do not take any medical information that you read on the net as truth without fully researching all informed opinions.

posted by Luke at 20:17:54  

Saturday, November 17, 2007

The Questions that don’t get asked

Did you catch this story?

In a nutshell: yet another example of the government/media complex attempting to steer public debate to ward’s issues it feel it can control. It is also another example of why there are so many people that are inherently distrustful of elections and voting in general.

I do not intend to make this blog post personal. Granted there are many uneducated people who turn into the debates to get knowledgeable of the candidates and the issues. But much of the blame lies also in people like Maria Luisa, someone WHO is educated and CHOSE not to ask the question of importance to her.

The sad thing is Maria actually played along with the government/media complex. She submitted a list of questions she wished to ask, of which some where approved- including the ‘one’ question she felt of most importance. And then, with the microphone, the lights and the camera on her she agreed to ask a ‘girly’ question. An obvious plant of the Klinton camp to help her appear less like the bitch she is.

Quite simply: she should of asked about ‘her’ issue- the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. Most of us, I believe, would prefer to ask our desired queries. But then again they wouldn’t let people like you and me even get into, let alone ask a question, at a faux debate like this.

The right, inherit in the Constitution via the right to elect our leaders and petition for a redress of grievances, to question our elected officials is hanging onto a slim thread. The committee and candidates that organized this debate knew that they could script the debate as they wished. They knew because they got to choose the questions, and therefore the issues, that they even would address.

But this is only one example of a most dangerous chain of events that is emerging that exposes the government/media complex to all. Does anyone remember when FEMA used planted staff members to question the FEMA Chief on its disaster preparedness response? Yeah, I am sure that person really asked a question that could expose deficiencies in their operation. Does anyone remember when Andrew Meyer asked Senator John Kerry of his refusal to verify the electoral count and his involvement in the Skull and Crossbones Society?

Lets map this out, shall we?

1) You cannot question the government, the government will do it for you.

2) You cannot use the media to question the government, they will chose what to ask for you.

3) And finally, should to you chose to act out of ‘disobedience’ you will be tazered, black bagged and made out to be a troublemaker. Problems with the law, your employer and in your domestic life will be arranged shortly thereafter.

Do you see how dangerous this is? I cannot stress this enough- many of my conservative friends see this as unrelated, conspiratorial or even necessary in a ‘post-9-11′ world. So if we are honest with our elected officials we deserve to be tazered, have trumped up charges brought against us and have our employer and family harassed?

Think about it, please. Do you REALLY want Hillary to have the power to lock up Republicans who question her? Do you really want the IRS to be able to stifle dissenters when they ‘question’ a church about its activities? Do you really trust a government to let the questions be asked in a debate that are of importance to you?

Someone told me, “well your idea is just unrealistic, candidates don’t have enough time to answer every question’.

Make time, your the one running for office. If you want my vote, you will answer my question the way I want it answered. I don’t care about Wolf Blitzers obviously way too cozy relationship with the Klinton camp. I don’t care what issues the Idaho Statesman picks out of the air to make a candidate ‘electable’ [according to their editorial board].

This is the information age- knowledge is at our fingertips with the power of the internet. We deserve better than pre-screened, scripted and planted comments to serve as a ‘debate’. Trust in government is at an all time low. Public hearings are increasingly just a matter of formality with little or no regard for public steering of our legal environment. Campaign donors and large media outlets serve to insulate public officials from the public. Public debate now stresses compliance over information.

We are living in dangerous times. If not for the rise of alternative media and blogs on the internet the government/media complex have have had succeeded in its complete takeover of the public policy and electoral process along time ago. We are entering a renaissance of real public debate. We can only assume, given the following map above, that this new doctrine is simply unacceptable to those with power.

Let us hope that it doesn’t become increasingly dangerous to question our leaders. Let us hope that they realize that by answering our questions they could restore public trust in the system and maybe even bring more voters on board with their campaigns.

But we know that the government/media complex doesn’t want that to happen, now don’t we?

Isn’t progress great?

posted by Luke at 22:21:07  

Thursday, November 15, 2007

College Football Games Of Note For The Weekend of November 17th, 2007

The Heisman Watch-

ESPN Heisman Watch link, here.

Looks like McFadden will have to be satisfied with third place Hesiman balloting.

Booty is still out of the picture.

The SEC Games-

(1) LSU v Mississippi- Ole Miss is 0-6 in the SEC and giving up 28 points a game. Enough said. On CBS.

Florida Atlantic v (12) Florida- Ummm take the home team.

(23) Kentucky v (9) Georgia- Kentucky has fallen to 3-3 in SEC play. A win here could get the momentum moving forward again.  At its core this is a match up of the pass game, Kentucky, and the run game, Georgia.  The bottom line is this Georgia should be able to use the run game and home field advantage to control the game. Look for Kentucky to try and keep it interesting.

Vanderbilt v (20) Tennessee- In Ainge We Trust. Big game to ’show me something’ for the Vols.

The PAC-10 Games-

(2) Oregon v Arizona- Thursday night games always seem to catch ranked teams off guard. Dixon is great and Arizona gives up 28 points a game. Arizona likes to pass, which plays into Oregon’s defense. The Ducks should be able to move the ball and control the clock with the run game.

The ACC Games-

Miami(FL) v (10) Virginia Tech- No chance.

(17) BC v (15) Clemson- I still believe that BC is the better team.

The Big 12 Games-

(5) Missouri v Kansas St- No chance. Losing at home, thats sad…

Iowa St. v (3) Kansas- Nothing says ‘great football game’ than the Iowa St Cyclones! lol…

Finally, a decent game…

(4) Oklahoma v Texas Tech- this game is on ABC, my must watch game of the week. Look for the Sooners to smother Techs offense to put the Tech scheme to shame. Oklahoma continues to state it’s case for the BCS.

The Big 10 Games-

(7) Ohio St v (21) Michigan- Lloyd Carr should, and will be, fired at the end of this season. But it sure would be nice if he does out with a bang and gives Sweater-Vest another loss. I don’t buy either team, but Michigan has the worst of the uphill battle playing a must win game against an ugly defense front. On ABC.

Northwestern v (19) Illinois- Yawn.

(25) Wisconsin v Minnesota- The Golden Gophers… hmmm.. they really, really suck.

The Big East Games-

Syracuse v (24) UConn- Orangeman are embarrassing. Just a game UConn needs to get going again, and to stay atop the Big East.

(6) West Virginia v (22) Cincinnati- Wake up! Finally a good game to write about… ok here we go… Neither game gives up many points, only about 14 points a game. West Virginia seems to have the upper hand with its offensive production. But Cinci is playing at home. If WV and UConn both lose this week Cinci could find themselves on top of the Big East. There is some motivation for you. Too bad they have to beat WV to do it.

The W[eak]A[nd]C[ompletelyembarassing] Games-

(16) Hawaii v Nevada- The Wolf pack desperately want a win to prove they are legit. They will need to catch Colt Brennan off balance to do just that. Nevada game BSU all it could handle in a 4OT game. BSU won, look for Nevada to try and knock off another WAC leading program. Home field won’t be much of an advantage as not many show up for their football games.

finally my Boise State Broncos…..

Idaho v (18) BSU- Weeeeeee, its ‘rivalry’ week. Im so excited to get pumped up about playing the 1-9 Vandals, whose quarterback has thrown 15 interceptions. Look for the Bronco D to add to that number this weekend. This game is a local favorite, but it is almost always over before it starts, but what else is new for a reasonably decent team stuck in the WAC???


Did I miss the call? Register as a user and let me know! Unless your a Vandal fan, in which case I feel pity for you. Someone out there loves you… just not at Lede Agenda.

posted by Luke at 17:11:41  

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Government Should Not Support ANY Olympics

President Bush vetoes bill with Special Olympics funding

I am sure some politically correct fascist will try and use this to show how ‘evil’ the President is. Whatever, the veto was justified, unfortunately Bush has let one too many of these pork-barrel bills slip past.

Taken a look at the Federal Budget debt lately? You should, especially if you have kids. They will be paying this off for the rest of their lives.

We have to get a handle on things. The only way to restore sanity to this nightmare is a strict return to the Constitution. Special interest legislation, like the Special Olympics, have to go. Every organization cannot simply come to the foot of Government and demand a handout based on some ‘need’.

Government will have to be shrunk. The problem is there is very little political will to do it. The politicans are too entrenched in the re-election scheme to be able to come to a grasp of it, and Congressional and State budgets just keep growing and growing. On average 6% a year, without fail.

The defeat of Proposition 2 in Idaho which allowed the repeal of term limits may very well have been the last chance for a real honest effort by the conservatives in Idaho to stop the escalation of government intrusion into their lives. As long as you have the career politicians running the show, the voters will face an uphill battle from stopping the introduction of new government ‘benefits’.

Simply put, Special Olympics wants tax money because they cannot muster enough support to keep their product alive. The government/media complex has been pushing new ‘Special Olympics Idaho’ stories on KTVB ever since the prospect of bringing the ‘games’ here started. They wanted to bilk the taxpayers eight million dollars for the ‘honor’ of hosting the charade. Whatever.

What sickens me most is that under the guise of ‘tolerance and diversity,’ government is being bled dry with special interest spending. The politicians are too afraid to be labeled a ‘hate monger’ to stand up to the abuse of taxpayer money. Try getting an eight million dollar beni for your ‘White Male Heterosexual Republican Christian Games’. Yeah, good luck with that. And yet somehow when taxpayers are forced to foot the most ridiculous and outrageous publicly funded events we are supposed to say nothing.

Neon wings at the Boise Airport.

An Anne Frank Memorial in state with only ONE Jewish church.

Special Olympic funding when our schools, roads and troops are needing maintenance.

A ‘Mexican-Cultural’ center in Nampa, which boasts one of the highest illegal-immigrant crime rates in the state.

In other words- it all adds up. It all matters. It all comes back to the pocketbook.

When are the politicians going to grow some damn balls and start saying NO!

I find it funny that once again it has taken the nations’ least popular President in history to do the right thing. The sad part is the Special Olympics will still get their funding, the rabid liberals will just attach it as a rider to another unrelated bill, it doesn’t even have to be a spending bill, until the measure passes. That is the consequence of not having single issue legislation. And then, to put icing on the cake, the jackasses in Washington will call the bill the, ‘Patriotic America Act’ or the ‘Support Mom’s Home-Made Apple Pie Bill’. After all, you’re not against America and apple pie are you Senator?

I guess you have to have wide stance in your view of what the Constitution allows if your going to make it as a politician. But that doesn’t make it right. And it certainly doesn’t make it easy to be a Ron Paul-ian when the media is so indoctrinated with the politically correct crap.

When will the voice of the taxpayers be heard? We do not have to fund all of this, we do not have to let the system be robbed by those with agendas anymore.  It is time to stop pandering to every special interest group that wants a handout from Uncle Sam. It’s time to start reducing the size of government. It’s time for politicians to man-up and realize that saying NO isn’t going to be popular, but it is going to be right.

Social engineering at its finest- taken by force, given by greed.

posted by Luke at 00:09:41  

Monday, November 12, 2007

Captain Obvious Strikes Again!

Smoke crack, eat junk food and and live in an unhealthy enviroment while pregnant and your baby will suffer. Avoid the aformentioned ills and your baby is less likely to develop problems.

I wonder… how much did the taxpayers have to pay for this study??

posted by Luke at 15:38:46  

Monday, November 12, 2007

‘24′ Producer- ‘the notion of Hillary as President is nuts’

The story, here.

posted by Luke at 12:10:25  
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress

Effective Websites: Developers Studio | Boise, Idaho | Web Design