ledeagenda.com

 

I write about this subject with great hesitation because I know that harassment by government officials is routine for those objecting to what is deemed, ‘necessary’ or ‘required’. However I feel the time to be quiet, for all areas in life, is over. Conservatives, Liberals, everyone with a concern must speak up now. Our nation is a crossroads, will we be complacent is letting those with power socially engineer a system with flaws? Or will we wake and and realize liberty, the securing of which is the ONLY legitimate reason for government to exist according to the Founders, needs to rule the day?

I am talking about the subject of forced childhood vaccinations.

Quite simply, although there does not appear to be a direct link between early childhood vaccinations and the increasing rates of autism in this country, numerous studies need to indicate that there may be procedural or mechanical flaws that is contributing to the alarming rise of autism in the United States.

I do not intend to for this post to be a scientific article, but the research does exist that either an element that currently exists in the MMR and Hep B vaccine is contributing  to the rise in autism [more than likely the mercury compounds that exist therein] or that the vaccines, when administered prior to age 2, may trigger developmental abnormalities that may not otherwise exist.

One source on the possible link, here.

One source on autism awareness and causes, here.

Yet another source that argues Thimerosal [i.e. the mercury additive] causes autism, here.

But I am *NOT* writing this post to sway you one way or another on childhood vaccinations. Know this- my child is fully vaccinated according to the state immunization schedule. However, that does not mean I feel guilt everyday for not have researched this issue heavier before we chose to accept the state’s persuasion.

I am writing this post to advocate for parents rights.

It seems immensely dangerous to grant government the power to forcibly medicate your child when the possibility may exist that the vaccine itself, as currently rendered, could trigger developmental disorders.

A slight diversion, but the media being the media will never otherwise connect the two. But we know better.

Boston PD want authority to search children’s rooms, without a warrant. That story, here.

Do you see where this is going? Under the guise, ‘to protect the children’ that government wants to suspend your civil rights and introduce forced medication~ to hell with the consequences! Quite simply it is unacceptable. The government deems your child as it’s own property. You mearly comply with the requests that government makes with your little, ‘wards of the state’.

As I mentioned before, I post on this issue with great reluctance. The ‘noble’ medical profession boarders on that of a fascist empire, where as long a ’sound health’ is implied anything goes. Many otherwise quality parents have been harassed by civil authorities for questioning mandatory vaccination scheduling.

Please know this: in it enormously, if not impossible, to have a discussion about this with your child’s Pediatrician. The legal environment is such that absolute compliance for CDC reports is one of the best ways to fight off malpractice lawsuits. Should you choose to accept this as an issue, be prepared: Your child’s doctor WILL lie to you in order to cover their ass. Until further research is done as to why autism is spiking after vaccinations, they have but little choice but to operate in such a manner.

But that doesn’t mean your are the one whom has to be ultimately responsible for your child’s well-being. Research the links. Ask your pediatrician if they use Thimerosol free vaccinations. Ask them if they screen for genetic abnormalities that could trigger autism when combined with an earlier vaccination schedule.

Let me put it this way- if they knew mercury was in the shots, and continued to give them, what assurances to we really have that OTHER dangerous additives are not still present in the vaccine? We have none.

This legislation is outright abuse of governmental power. Due process, probable cause, and a fair trail all are thrown out by imposing a school-house court system for parents whom choose to research their child’s health. Again, every action has an equal an opposite reaction- its a fundamental law of nature. This is not an issue you can just read a blog post about and become an ‘expert’ on. It will require time, effort and possibly awkward and tension filled moments with your doctor. But if you don’t ask if mercury is being pumped into your child, who will?

Efforts to hide the truth usually take effort that would not otherwise need to be taken. We can only surmise by the actions taken by the Maryland School District that an open debate about this issue will not be tolerated. Given the data above, we can only wonder where the truth lies on this issue.

---

A warning: I am not medically trained. Any material presented herein should be discussed with a trusted medical advisor. Do not take any medical information that you read on the net as truth without fully researching all informed opinions.

Did you catch this story?

In a nutshell: yet another example of the government/media complex attempting to steer public debate to ward’s issues it feel it can control. It is also another example of why there are so many people that are inherently distrustful of elections and voting in general.

I do not intend to make this blog post personal. Granted there are many uneducated people who turn into the debates to get knowledgeable of the candidates and the issues. But much of the blame lies also in people like Maria Luisa, someone WHO is educated and CHOSE not to ask the question of importance to her.

The sad thing is Maria actually played along with the government/media complex. She submitted a list of questions she wished to ask, of which some where approved- including the ‘one’ question she felt of most importance. And then, with the microphone, the lights and the camera on her she agreed to ask a ‘girly’ question. An obvious plant of the Klinton camp to help her appear less like the bitch she is.

Quite simply: she should of asked about ‘her’ issue- the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. Most of us, I believe, would prefer to ask our desired queries. But then again they wouldn’t let people like you and me even get into, let alone ask a question, at a faux debate like this.

The right, inherit in the Constitution via the right to elect our leaders and petition for a redress of grievances, to question our elected officials is hanging onto a slim thread. The committee and candidates that organized this debate knew that they could script the debate as they wished. They knew because they got to choose the questions, and therefore the issues, that they even would address.

But this is only one example of a most dangerous chain of events that is emerging that exposes the government/media complex to all. Does anyone remember when FEMA used planted staff members to question the FEMA Chief on its disaster preparedness response? Yeah, I am sure that person really asked a question that could expose deficiencies in their operation. Does anyone remember when Andrew Meyer asked Senator John Kerry of his refusal to verify the electoral count and his involvement in the Skull and Crossbones Society?

Lets map this out, shall we?

1) You cannot question the government, the government will do it for you.

2) You cannot use the media to question the government, they will chose what to ask for you.

3) And finally, should to you chose to act out of ‘disobedience’ you will be tazered, black bagged and made out to be a troublemaker. Problems with the law, your employer and in your domestic life will be arranged shortly thereafter.

Do you see how dangerous this is? I cannot stress this enough- many of my conservative friends see this as unrelated, conspiratorial or even necessary in a ‘post-9-11′ world. So if we are honest with our elected officials we deserve to be tazered, have trumped up charges brought against us and have our employer and family harassed?

Think about it, please. Do you REALLY want Hillary to have the power to lock up Republicans who question her? Do you really want the IRS to be able to stifle dissenters when they ‘question’ a church about its activities? Do you really trust a government to let the questions be asked in a debate that are of importance to you?

Someone told me, “well your idea is just unrealistic, candidates don’t have enough time to answer every question’.

Make time, your the one running for office. If you want my vote, you will answer my question the way I want it answered. I don’t care about Wolf Blitzers obviously way too cozy relationship with the Klinton camp. I don’t care what issues the Idaho Statesman picks out of the air to make a candidate ‘electable’ [according to their editorial board].

This is the information age- knowledge is at our fingertips with the power of the internet. We deserve better than pre-screened, scripted and planted comments to serve as a ‘debate’. Trust in government is at an all time low. Public hearings are increasingly just a matter of formality with little or no regard for public steering of our legal environment. Campaign donors and large media outlets serve to insulate public officials from the public. Public debate now stresses compliance over information.

We are living in dangerous times. If not for the rise of alternative media and blogs on the internet the government/media complex have have had succeeded in its complete takeover of the public policy and electoral process along time ago. We are entering a renaissance of real public debate. We can only assume, given the following map above, that this new doctrine is simply unacceptable to those with power.

Let us hope that it doesn’t become increasingly dangerous to question our leaders. Let us hope that they realize that by answering our questions they could restore public trust in the system and maybe even bring more voters on board with their campaigns.

But we know that the government/media complex doesn’t want that to happen, now don’t we?

Isn’t progress great?

The Heisman Watch-

ESPN Heisman Watch link, here.

Looks like McFadden will have to be satisfied with third place Hesiman balloting.

Booty is still out of the picture.

The SEC Games-

(1) LSU v Mississippi- Ole Miss is 0-6 in the SEC and giving up 28 points a game. Enough said. On CBS.

Florida Atlantic v (12) Florida- Ummm take the home team.

(23) Kentucky v (9) Georgia- Kentucky has fallen to 3-3 in SEC play. A win here could get the momentum moving forward again.  At its core this is a match up of the pass game, Kentucky, and the run game, Georgia.  The bottom line is this Georgia should be able to use the run game and home field advantage to control the game. Look for Kentucky to try and keep it interesting.

Vanderbilt v (20) Tennessee- In Ainge We Trust. Big game to ’show me something’ for the Vols.

The PAC-10 Games-

(2) Oregon v Arizona- Thursday night games always seem to catch ranked teams off guard. Dixon is great and Arizona gives up 28 points a game. Arizona likes to pass, which plays into Oregon’s defense. The Ducks should be able to move the ball and control the clock with the run game.

The ACC Games-

Miami(FL) v (10) Virginia Tech- No chance.

(17) BC v (15) Clemson- I still believe that BC is the better team.

The Big 12 Games-

(5) Missouri v Kansas St- No chance. Losing at home, thats sad…

Iowa St. v (3) Kansas- Nothing says ‘great football game’ than the Iowa St Cyclones! lol…

Finally, a decent game…

(4) Oklahoma v Texas Tech- this game is on ABC, my must watch game of the week. Look for the Sooners to smother Techs offense to put the Tech scheme to shame. Oklahoma continues to state it’s case for the BCS.

The Big 10 Games-

(7) Ohio St v (21) Michigan- Lloyd Carr should, and will be, fired at the end of this season. But it sure would be nice if he does out with a bang and gives Sweater-Vest another loss. I don’t buy either team, but Michigan has the worst of the uphill battle playing a must win game against an ugly defense front. On ABC.

Northwestern v (19) Illinois- Yawn.

(25) Wisconsin v Minnesota- The Golden Gophers… hmmm.. they really, really suck.

The Big East Games-

Syracuse v (24) UConn- Orangeman are embarrassing. Just a game UConn needs to get going again, and to stay atop the Big East.

(6) West Virginia v (22) Cincinnati- Wake up! Finally a good game to write about… ok here we go… Neither game gives up many points, only about 14 points a game. West Virginia seems to have the upper hand with its offensive production. But Cinci is playing at home. If WV and UConn both lose this week Cinci could find themselves on top of the Big East. There is some motivation for you. Too bad they have to beat WV to do it.

The W[eak]A[nd]C[ompletelyembarassing] Games-

(16) Hawaii v Nevada- The Wolf pack desperately want a win to prove they are legit. They will need to catch Colt Brennan off balance to do just that. Nevada game BSU all it could handle in a 4OT game. BSU won, look for Nevada to try and knock off another WAC leading program. Home field won’t be much of an advantage as not many show up for their football games.

finally my Boise State Broncos…..

Idaho v (18) BSU- Weeeeeee, its ‘rivalry’ week. Im so excited to get pumped up about playing the 1-9 Vandals, whose quarterback has thrown 15 interceptions. Look for the Bronco D to add to that number this weekend. This game is a local favorite, but it is almost always over before it starts, but what else is new for a reasonably decent team stuck in the WAC???

---

Did I miss the call? Register as a user and let me know! Unless your a Vandal fan, in which case I feel pity for you. Someone out there loves you… just not at Lede Agenda.

President Bush vetoes bill with Special Olympics funding

I am sure some politically correct fascist will try and use this to show how ‘evil’ the President is. Whatever, the veto was justified, unfortunately Bush has let one too many of these pork-barrel bills slip past.

Taken a look at the Federal Budget debt lately? You should, especially if you have kids. They will be paying this off for the rest of their lives.

We have to get a handle on things. The only way to restore sanity to this nightmare is a strict return to the Constitution. Special interest legislation, like the Special Olympics, have to go. Every organization cannot simply come to the foot of Government and demand a handout based on some ‘need’.

Government will have to be shrunk. The problem is there is very little political will to do it. The politicans are too entrenched in the re-election scheme to be able to come to a grasp of it, and Congressional and State budgets just keep growing and growing. On average 6% a year, without fail.

The defeat of Proposition 2 in Idaho which allowed the repeal of term limits may very well have been the last chance for a real honest effort by the conservatives in Idaho to stop the escalation of government intrusion into their lives. As long as you have the career politicians running the show, the voters will face an uphill battle from stopping the introduction of new government ‘benefits’.

Simply put, Special Olympics wants tax money because they cannot muster enough support to keep their product alive. The government/media complex has been pushing new ‘Special Olympics Idaho’ stories on KTVB ever since the prospect of bringing the ‘games’ here started. They wanted to bilk the taxpayers eight million dollars for the ‘honor’ of hosting the charade. Whatever.

What sickens me most is that under the guise of ‘tolerance and diversity,’ government is being bled dry with special interest spending. The politicians are too afraid to be labeled a ‘hate monger’ to stand up to the abuse of taxpayer money. Try getting an eight million dollar beni for your ‘White Male Heterosexual Republican Christian Games’. Yeah, good luck with that. And yet somehow when taxpayers are forced to foot the most ridiculous and outrageous publicly funded events we are supposed to say nothing.

Neon wings at the Boise Airport.

An Anne Frank Memorial in state with only ONE Jewish church.

Special Olympic funding when our schools, roads and troops are needing maintenance.

A ‘Mexican-Cultural’ center in Nampa, which boasts one of the highest illegal-immigrant crime rates in the state.

In other words- it all adds up. It all matters. It all comes back to the pocketbook.

When are the politicians going to grow some damn balls and start saying NO!

I find it funny that once again it has taken the nations’ least popular President in history to do the right thing. The sad part is the Special Olympics will still get their funding, the rabid liberals will just attach it as a rider to another unrelated bill, it doesn’t even have to be a spending bill, until the measure passes. That is the consequence of not having single issue legislation. And then, to put icing on the cake, the jackasses in Washington will call the bill the, ‘Patriotic America Act’ or the ‘Support Mom’s Home-Made Apple Pie Bill’. After all, you’re not against America and apple pie are you Senator?

I guess you have to have wide stance in your view of what the Constitution allows if your going to make it as a politician. But that doesn’t make it right. And it certainly doesn’t make it easy to be a Ron Paul-ian when the media is so indoctrinated with the politically correct crap.

When will the voice of the taxpayers be heard? We do not have to fund all of this, we do not have to let the system be robbed by those with agendas anymore.  It is time to stop pandering to every special interest group that wants a handout from Uncle Sam. It’s time to start reducing the size of government. It’s time for politicians to man-up and realize that saying NO isn’t going to be popular, but it is going to be right.

Social engineering at its finest- taken by force, given by greed.

Smoke crack, eat junk food and and live in an unhealthy enviroment while pregnant and your baby will suffer. Avoid the aformentioned ills and your baby is less likely to develop problems.

I wonder… how much did the taxpayers have to pay for this study??

The story, here.

Did you catch this story?

A wise man could write a case history out of this case. A simple history to be repeated over and over again until the utopia is defined in a way that the New World Order supports.

Simply put- insurrections have no problem using our own system against against us. Constrained by the prohibition guaranteeing freedom of speech? Simply define ’speech’ or ‘freedom’ to grant enough wiggle room to get the courts to accept your interpretation of the law. Freedom of association? Just make sure your poker buddy isn’t a ‘person of interest’.

Let me put it this way- the single biggest threat to the constitution is assuming that it is a document that can be molded and shaped to suit any purpose. It is ridiculous to think that we could be wise enough to outsmart the rule of law, our founders’ wishes, or the clear literal intent of the Constitution.

For example, the case at hand, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The Government/Media Complex would have us believe that:

Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people’s private communications and financial information.

The implications here, as pushed by Kerr, are that the responsibility of government to obtain a warrant to scope out people that is has deemed harmful is outdated. After all the Founders could have NEVER envisioned terrorists using our own soil against us.

Excuse me? I think the Founders knew very well of the possibility of terrorism. They knew full well the dangers of granting government unbridled access to civil detainment. One need only read the Declaration of Independence to realize the scope of the authority that King George claimed for himself. The Founders, wanting all to be free to seek their God-given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, among others, established the Constitutional limitations on the powers of the government.

But what gets lost in the fray! Oh, what gets lost.

Let us not forget that the Founders knew very well the possibility of terrorists plotting against us. They knew, without a doubt, that there can, and will always be, agents whom seek ill-gotten gains, follow a corrupt religion or have simply sunk into the depths of madness.

We can say this for certain because history, as always, repeats itself. After all, the Founders were terrorists. King George decreed it so. They were seeking Independence from his authority on land he deemed in his control. A war was fought, our Founders, who so bravely believed in the cause of freedom and liberty, were willing to be condemned as traitors should their cause fail.

And so you think I am alone in my assertions that the FISA act is a fundamental violation of our Constitutional rights? Here is another perspective, and makes probably the most important point that is missed in this debate: that the FISA act guts the courts from acting as a ‘checks and balances’ to a government whom has run away with its abuse on constitutional rights. That story, here.

Do you see the dangers of simply re-defining the Constitution for, ‘modern times’. There is an old saying, ‘the more things change, the more things stay the same’. And it would be wise for us to reflect on its meaning in this ‘post 9-11′ era. Nevermind that 9-11 was OVER six years ago. Nevermind the countless blood that has been shed or life interrupted under the guise of ’security’. The Founders knew full well what the world could deliver. And they sought to limit the power of  government in order to enable the human capacity to reach its God-given potential.

If our Constitution means nothing, and is simply the whim of interpretation, what rights do we have at all? Cannot words always be re-defined? Cannot anyone dream up new applications of law? There is no mystery as to the abusive power of government who operates outside of the rule of law. We saw it with Hitler and Mussolini, and will be witnesses of history with Chavez and Akmanajaed in our lifetimes.

But the mere existence of evil little men, like Akmanajaed, like Osama or Jung Ill, does not mean we have to stoop to their level. Vigilance, after all, is best rooted in freedom. What stake can a man have in society if his vigilance to others comes as cost to him? Very few people, I believe, would be willing to accept the abuses of government if it were granted the capacity to stop all evil. The Founders knew that. Do we not have the Constitution for a reason?

If being anonymous, or presumed innocent, is no longer socially passé, the implications are serious. The mere existence of the Constitution is nothing when put in the hands of men who do not have the capacity to accept its basic premise- that we are born free and that our rights are not granted by government, but rather we grant power to the government to protect our rights. Those are words we should be reflecting on.

Did you catch this story??

Let me put it this way: I will not be silenced, compliant or accepting of abortion for any reason. PERIOD. There is no acceptable reason for the murder of an innocent human baby.

You are a sick, disgusting, immoral waste-of-human-life if you find images like these acceptable. [WARNING!! EXTREMELY GRAPHIC!!!]

But there is another reason this story enrages me so. It is that of the silent fascism that blatantly ignores the Constitution, as if it is a document that can suit any given position.

Let me put it this way: Freedom of speech is SPECIFICALLY and DELIBERATELY protected as a civil right in the the very first amendment to the Constitution. Can you point me to where the KILLING OF A HUMAN is listed as a ‘certain inalienable right’ in the Constitution?

I also find it funny that the Death Provider in the court case:

“later stopped providing reproductive health services because she feared for her life.”

So it is ok for YOU to stop providing the service when YOUR life is threatened, but if the baby’s life is threatened, well that is ‘just a casualty to your profits?’ And don’t give me the BULL-CRAP that Planned Parenthood, et al., is non-profit. Educate yourself here.

The sheer scope of the attack on our constitutional rights is unveiled here. This is a ‘right’ that was CREATED, a ‘right’ that is not listed in the constitution. A ‘right’ that overturned legally passed laws in 39 states. A ‘right’ that does not exist, but is merely a policy preference of the New World Order.

I do not apologize for the link above. I know of no other way to show the reality and horror that is abortion. If I can shock even one person into the reality of what occurs when a deranged individual CHOOSES to have an abortion then I feel that I have spoken Truth.

This is yet another example of the relentless attack on the exchange of ideas on the net. It is because of stories like these, and the derailing of the Amnesty bill, that the Government/Media Complex will stop at nothing to install ‘gatekeepers’ dictating what you can and cannot see on the internet. Complete submission to the laws they create in a courtroom is demanded. Laws they create to suit their purpose.

What other ‘rights’ will they create? And how many Constitutional guarantees will have to be sacrificed before people realize that ‘rights’ do not exist unless given to us by natural law. Conception is a natural action. Murder, or the early termination of human life does go against the natural system in place.

Silencing blogs and INTERNET websites is the best way the New World Order can resist the flow of information and stop the new movement that has emerged to restore our nation to its constitutional limitations. We can be offered no reassurances that the corporate gatekeepers the government wishes to allow on the net will continue to allow us to access the information we choose.

Lets face it- the government’s attack on the internet is really an attack on true patriots who still believe in Liberty as the founders defined it. Every blogger beware, the government, if it so deems, can shutter your speech. All they have to do is prove some of your writings are ‘threatening’ to some aspect of the New World Order. Speech that the founders intended to protect to prevent tyrants like King George from silencing the opposition.

We are in the midst of the culture war. A few more key steps is all the government needs to impose near complete fascism. The only thing we can hope for now is to convince a few more people to stand for what is right before it becomes too late. Let us hope that minds are changed when the Truth comes out about what happens on the Abortionists table.